Considering human influence on animals
<dh@.> wrote in message ...
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:33:47 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>><dh@.> wrote in message ...
>>> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, the Goober claimed:
>>>>dh once again explained:
>>>>> "Dutch" wrote:
>>>>> >dh pointed out:
>>>
>>>>> >> I can see and understand the pureness of your selfishness
>>>>> >> in regards to livestock, but I don't have to join you in it
>>>>> >> ESPECIALLY because I can recognise it for what it is. I certainly
>>>>> >> do NOT want to join you in it, and doubt that I possibly could
>>>>> >> even if I did want to at this point. After having learned to
>>>>> >> appreciate
>>>>> >> the fact that many livestock have lives of positive value, I don't
>>>>> >> believe I could possibly ever develop your faith that veganism
>>>>> >> is the most ethically supreme possible approach.
>>>>>
>>>>> >You may as well go talk to someone who actually holds those beliefs,
>>>>> >you
>>>>> >obviously can't deal with my arguments.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's because your "argument" is based completely on
>>>>> a fantasy
>>>>
>>>>No, ****wit. His argument is based on facts and logic.
>>>
>>> I challenge either of you to present "them" Goobs.
>>
>>
>>Your challenges, like your quizzes, are worthless tripe, because you utter
>>them.
>
> I challenge
Too many challenges and quizzes nimrod, not enough thinking.
|