Considering human influence on animals
****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched ignorant cracker, lied:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:33:47 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched ignorant cracker, lied:
> >> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007,Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >>>****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched ignorant cracker, lied:
> >>>> "Dutch" wrote:
> >>>> >****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched ignorant cracker, lied:
>
> >>>> >> I can see and understand the pureness of your selfishness
> >>>> >> in regards to livestock, but I don't have to join you in it
> >>>> >> ESPECIALLY because I can recognise it for what it is. I certainly
> >>>> >> do NOT want to join you in it, and doubt that I possibly could
> >>>> >> even if I did want to at this point. After having learned to
> >>>> >> appreciate
> >>>> >> the fact that many livestock have lives of positive value, I don't
> >>>> >> believe I could possibly ever develop your faith that veganism
> >>>> >> is the most ethically supreme possible approach.
>
> >>>> >You may as well go talk to someone who actually holds those beliefs,
> >>>> >you
> >>>> >obviously can't deal with my arguments.
>
> >>>> That's because your "argument" is based completely on
> >>>> a fantasy
>
> >>>No, ****wit. His argument is based on facts and logic.
>
> >> I challenge either of you to present "them" Goobs.
>
> >Your challenges, like your quizzes, are worthless tripe, because you utter
> >them.
>
> I challenge either of you
No. You are never a challenge, ****wit.
|