Considering human influence on animals
****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched ignorant cracker, lied:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:50:08 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched ignorant cracker, lied:
> >> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >>> ****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched ignorant cracker, lied:
> >>>> Bagoo wrote:
> >>>>> dh pointed out:
>
> >>>>>> I can see and understand the pureness of your selfishness
> >>>>>> in regards to livestock, but I don't have to join you in it
> >>>>>> ESPECIALLY because I can recognise it for what it is. I certainly
> >>>>>> do NOT want to join you in it, and doubt that I possibly could
> >>>>>> even if I did want to at this point. After having learned to appreciate
> >>>>>> the fact that many livestock have lives of positive value, I don't
> >>>>>> believe I could possibly ever develop your faith that veganism
> >>>>>> is the most ethically supreme possible approach.
> >>>>> You may as well go talk to someone who actually holds those beliefs, you
> >>>>> obviously can't deal with my arguments.
> >>>> That's because your "argument" is based completely on
> >>>> a fantasy
> >>> No, ****wit. His argument is based on facts and logic.
>
> >> I challenge either of you to present "them", Goobs.
>
> >We have
>
> I challenge either of you
No, you don't, ****wit. You have never posed any kind of challenge to
us at all. Someone of your infantile intellect is no challenge at all.
|