****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched ignorant
cracker, lied:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:17:27 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>> ****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched ignorant cracker, lied:
>>> On 31 May 2007 13:02:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>
>>>> what you mean, ****wit, is that their lives "ought" to occur,
>>> Which particular their lives are you trying to refer to Rudy,
>>> and why do you think anything could suggest that "they"
>>> "ought to occur"?

YOU are the one who thinks "their" lives "ought" to
occur, ****wit. They don't exist, yet somehow -
fantastically - you think "they" ought to come into
existence and "get to experience life", because you
believe - fantastically - that doing so would be a
"benefit" to "them".


>>
>> If he's not correct, then what's selfish about advocating the elimination of
>> livestock?
>
> The selfishness is because it would ONLY benefit people
> who are disturbed by the fact that humans kill animals for
> food, but it would do nothing to help the animals.

How can *anything* help non-existent imaginary animals,
****wit? Goddamn, you just talk worse and worse
foolishness.

Make no mistake, ****wit - you think "they", meaning
non-existent imaginary livestock, could somehow
"benefit" by coming into existence. That is absolute
horseshit.