KASIMER's Rant-hE WILL ALWAYS BE ROTTEN
On Jun 6, 10:39 pm, "L. Credit Where Due T." >
wrote:
> On Jun 6, 9:01 pm, "REG" > wrote:
>
> > You're right, of course. It wasn't a 'rant' from Bill, and on that tiny
> > technicality Charlie was wrong. But it was just another sanctimonious
> > exercise from Bill. I wish that Charlie had just said to Bill that he (Bill)
> > was too much of a nerd for Charlie to bother with, and that the idea that
> > Charlie owed Bill an explanation of anything was a figment of Bill's
> > imagination. That would have been sufficient, and accurate.
>
> Pluperfectly accurate, actually.
>
> > It would also have been nice, of course, if Ken had come down off the fence
> > and made some statement about Bill's unwarranted passive-aggressive baiting
> > of Charlie, but maybe Ken thought it was obvious enough that it didn't need
> > comment.
>
> One would like to believe that was so, but ken's none-too-subtle
> remarks have clearly and repeatedly shown his approval of whatever
> needless nonsense bilious kazzyMerde spews..Richard Garmise
>
> The sanctimony shared and perpetuated by them and by their few cohorts
> is of a thickness commensurate with their fatuous, fat skulls. Alas.
>
>
>
> > "jrw" > wrote in message
>
> roups.com...
>
> > > On Jun 6, 6:18 pm, Leporello > wrote:
> > >> On 6 Jun, 11:01, wkasimer > wrote:
>
> > >> > On Jun 5, 11:57 am, Leporello > wrote:
>
> > >> > >Now...question.....If someone breaks the truce..will you yell at
> > >> > >him..or will you join in and not be able to keep to the pledge....
>
> > >> > The real questions are these:
>
> > >> > When someone takes issue with the substance of one of your "operatic
> > >> > postings", are you going to interpret that as "breaking the truce"?
>
> > >> > When someone else "breaks the truce", as will certainly happen at some
> > >> > point, will you be able to control yourself and ignore it? With a few
> > >> > obvious exceptions, the vast majority of RMO members seem quite
> > >> > capable of ignoring your instigations; is there some reason why you
> > >> > can't ignore the instigations of others? Or doesn't that standard
> > >> > apply to you?
>
> > >> > Bill
>
> > >> I AM SO GLAD TO READ THIS NASTY RANT OF ONE OF THE PRIME INSTIGATORS
> > >> OF THE TROUBLE...IT AGAIN PROVES THAT NO MATTER WHAT I SAY OR DO..THE
> > >> SAME REACTION FROM THE SAME PEOPLE...GOOOD.....NOW THE REST OF US SEE
> > >> HIM FOR WHAT HE ALWAYS WAS....
>
> > >> AS DON PAOLO SAYS...WHAT IS THE USE???????????????????????????????????
>
> > > Far from a rant... Not one insulting comment there. Rather than
> > > shouting, why not try answering in the same tone?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|