Rupert wrote:
> On Jun 6, 4:44 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Jun 6, 2:41 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>> "Rupert" > wrote
>>>>> I doubt very much that you are making a good faith attempt at serious
>>>>> debate. If you are, then poor you.
>>>> That about sums you up Rupert. For all your posturing about being serious
>>>> about moral philosophy and bragging that you're into real serious debate,
>>>> the threads you get heavliy involved with are always the lowest common
>>>> demoninator mudslinging contests.
>>> Agreed, but I hardly think that's my fault.
>> It is entirely your fault, rupie. Just as you
>> voluntarily, actively, knowingly and repeatedly
>> participate in processes that cause animals to die, so
>> do you choose to participate in mudslinging, with all
>> the same attributes attaching to your choice.
>>
>
> It is not my fault that this newsgroup is constantly in the gutter

It is largely the fault of you and people like you.
You are a gutter dweller.


>>>> Rudy uses logic and embellishes it with
>>>> direct insults, you use pseudo-intellectual jibber-jabber and condescension
>>>> as your ad hominem weapons of choice. Bottom line, it's all the same gutter.
>>> Rudy provides flawed arguments,
>> No.
>>
>
> Yep,

No.


>>> I provide him with reasoned responses.
>> No, absolutely not. You regurgitate "ar" dogma, that's
>> all.

Right.