<dh@.> wrote in message news
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:20:22 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>><dh@.> wrote in message ...
>>> On Thu, 31 May 2007 18:38:04 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>
> wrote
>>>>> For years "aras" have been insisting that we give no consideration to
>>>>> the lives of livestock. Some have taken it to the extent of insisting
>>>>> that
>>>>> we must never consider the lives of anything, though those in that
>>>>> position from time to time also pretend to understand the value of
>>>>> some
>>>>> lives, for some never explained reason(s). So what are we allowed to
>>>>> consider? It is okay to consider the lives of any of the following,
>>>>> when
>>>>> considering human influence on animals:
>>>>
>>>>What do you mean by "consider"?
>>>
>>> Take into consideration, especially when giving thought to human
>>> influence on animals.
>>
>>Taking into consideration is not the same as "being considerate".
>
> You admittedly do neither.

Stop using that equivocation ****wit, you're not fooling anyone.