dh@. wrote:
> On 31 May 2007 13:10:42 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
>> ****wit David Harrison, clumsily and ineptly trying to disguise
>> himself, blabbered:
>>> For years "aras" have been insisting that
>> **** off, ****wit.
>
> You too Rudy.

**** off, ****wit, you ****. You stupidly tried an
absurd sock puppet move, and you got your ass kicked
for it. **** off.


>
>> Coming into existence is not a "benefit" for livestock,
>
> You have yet to even address that

Done, hundreds of times. Coming into existence is not
- CANNOT be - a benefit.


>> ****wit, and
>> preventing any future livestock would not be doing anything "to" non-
>> existent entities.
>
> You feel that your imagined "entities" would be better off
> not ever existing

Not my "imagined entities", ****wit - yours. And you
*clearly* believe that imagined, non-existent entities
would be better off coming into existence. That's just
****witted and bizarre beyond belief, ****wit. But
that's what you believe.