Considering human influence on animals
dh@. wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 18:38:04 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>> > wrote
>>> For years "aras" have been insisting that we give no consideration to
>>> the lives of livestock. Some have taken it to the extent of insisting that
>>> we must never consider the lives of anything, though those in that
>>> position from time to time also pretend to understand the value of some
>>> lives, for some never explained reason(s). So what are we allowed to
>>> consider? It is okay to consider the lives of any of the following, when
>>> considering human influence on animals:
>> What do you mean by "consider"?
>
> Take into consideration,
Circular; bullshit. Dismissed.
>> Be more explicit.
>
> You need to be more capable.
Evasion noted.
|