****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched as always, lied:
> On 30 May 2007 12:41:47 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
> >They have no intrinsic moral meaning until and unless
> >the livestock exist.
>
> If you think you have any clue about any of this Rudy,

Much, much more than a clue, ****wit. I have done the entire
analysis.


> then attempt to explain any sort of meaning you're able
> to comprehend and appreciate regarding livestock who
> do exist.

****wit, you stupid pig-****ing cracker: we *always* and *only* have
been talking about the "consideration" you wish to give livestock
*PRIOR* to their existence. You are far too stupid and inept and shit-
brained to try to get away with the switch you just attempted, you
stupid ****.


> Don't even refer to your imaginary nonexistent
> "entities" Rudy,

No, ****wit - YOUR "imaginary nonexistent 'entities'", except,
****wit, that you stupidly and irrationally think they exist. This
has *always* and *only* been about YOUR belief that the "future farm
animals" are, today, morally considerable entities. They are not,
and you are a ****wit.