<dh@.> wrote in message ...
> On 30 May 2007 12:41:47 -0700, Goo wrote:
>
>>They have no intrinsic moral meaning until and unless
>>the livestock exist.
>
> If you think you have any clue about any of this Goo,
> then attempt to explain any sort of meaning you're able
> to comprehend and appreciate regarding livestock who
> do exist. Don't even refer to your imaginary nonexistent
> "entities" Goobs, just try to tell us about the real ones.


Livestock who exist only need us to pay attention to their welfare. What
benefit do you imagine your "appreciation" gives them? I'll tell you, Zero.
It's your misguided, blundering way to deal with the accusations of ARAs who
say that it's cruel to raise livestock.