Considering human influence on animals
> wrote
> For years "aras" have been insisting that we give no consideration to
> the lives of livestock. Some have taken it to the extent of insisting that
> we must never consider the lives of anything, though those in that
> position from time to time also pretend to understand the value of some
> lives, for some never explained reason(s). So what are we allowed to
> consider? It is okay to consider the lives of any of the following, when
> considering human influence on animals:
What do you mean by "consider"? Be more explicit.
> 1a 2 week old fawns killed by dogs
> 1b 2 week old fawns killed by wolves
> 1c 2 week old fawns killed heavy snow
> 1d 2 year old deer killed by human hunters
>
> 2a 5 day old field mice killed by plows
> 2b 5 day old field mice killed by snakes
> 2c 5 day old field mice killed by heavy rain
> 2d 2 year old field mice killed by traps
>
> 3a 6 week old pheasants killed by cars
> 3b 6 week old pheasants killed by hawks
> 3c 6 week old pheasants killed by getting caught in fences
> 3d 6 week old pheasants killed by human hunters
>
> 4a 4 week old broiler chicks killed by power failures
> 4b 4 week old broiler chicks killed by weasels
> 4c 4 week old broiler chicks killed by drowning when pipes break
> 4d 6 week old broiler chicks killed by commercial slaughter
> 4e 4 week old broiler chicks killed by rats
> 4f 4 week old broiler chicks killed by disease
> 4g 4 week old broiler chicks killed by smothering
> 4h 4 week old broiler chicks killed by bad feed
> 4i 4 week old broiler chicks killed by tornadoes
> 4j 4 week old broiler chicks killed by getting stepped on
> 4k 4 week old broiler chicks killed by foxes
> 4l 4 week old broiler chicks killed by dogs
> 4m 3 day old broiler chicks killed by snakes
> 4n 4 week old broiler chicks killed by flooding from heavy rain
|