"ricky's babysitter" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> On May 28, 11:17 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> Dean Wormer wrote:
>> > Hello Rudy,
>>
>> > Thanks for posting this. It's too long, of course, but that's par for
>> > the course in these internet groups, isn't it.
>>
>> > Your main argument is actually quite elegant, and could be expressed
>> > in almost mathematical terms. Alas, it was not. Instead, you have
>> > let your fingers do your shouting, and you have succumbed to several
>> > nasty habits of the truly indignant, such as capitalizing things that
>> > read quite well without the inverted commas - including, as just one
>> > but probably the silliest example, the word "food" itself in the last
>> > paragraph.
>>
>> > Rudy, you are the sort of opponent that some of us on the other side
>> > (!) treasu intelligent, articulate, logical, etc.; and I for one
>> > look forward to seeing your argument expressed in plain English.
>>
>> > Yours,
>>
>> > D.W.
>>
>> Thanks for the constructive criticism regarding style.
>> It's a pity you couldn't address the substance.
>
>
>
>
>
> That's because there wasn't any.

According to Dean there was, in fact he called the arguments "elegant", he
just had no meaningful response, like you.