Dean Wormer wrote:
> Hello Rudy,
>
> Thanks for posting this. It's too long, of course, but that's par for
> the course in these internet groups, isn't it.
>
> Your main argument is actually quite elegant, and could be expressed
> in almost mathematical terms. Alas, it was not. Instead, you have
> let your fingers do your shouting, and you have succumbed to several
> nasty habits of the truly indignant, such as capitalizing things that
> read quite well without the inverted commas - including, as just one
> but probably the silliest example, the word "food" itself in the last
> paragraph.
>
> Rudy, you are the sort of opponent that some of us on the other side
> (!) treasu intelligent, articulate, logical, etc.; and I for one
> look forward to seeing your argument expressed in plain English.
>
> Yours,
>
> D.W.

Thanks for the constructive criticism regarding style.
It's a pity you couldn't address the substance.