On Mon, 21 May 2007 23:27:06 -0500, Emma Thackery >
rummaged among random neurons and opined:

>
>While I suspect this story goes back a ways, I only heard today on
>KCRW's "Good Food" that the FDA is considering a new definition for
>chocolate which would allow other plant oils to sub for real cocoa
>butter. It seemed like they were saying that a product might not have
>any chocolate and still be called chocolate. Anyone else aware of this?
>I have not heard it at all on the MSM.

Actually, I posted the link to the LA Times article several weeks ago.
Old news.

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd

--
"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"