Emma Thackery wrote:
> While I suspect this story goes back a ways, I only heard today on
> KCRW's "Good Food" that the FDA is considering a new definition for
> chocolate which would allow other plant oils to sub for real cocoa
> butter. It seemed like they were saying that a product might not have
> any chocolate and still be called chocolate. Anyone else aware of
> this? I have not heard it at all on the MSM.

It's old news and has been discussed.

--
Dave
www.davebbq.com