EZ wrote:
> " BOB" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> " Nonny" might also try responding at the bottom of the post (like all
> good,
>> intellegent, people do!) and then more people might read his posts and
>> respond to them.
>
> I'm not Nonny, but your reply prompts me to ask the general populace of this
> newsgroup, or its owner if he/she still posts here, what is the accepted
> protocol - top posting or bottom posting. Neither is the universal de facto
> standard, although I'm guessing one or the other is the rule on this
> particular newsgroup. For example, at my workplace, top posting is the
> accepted norm, and we all learn to read from the bottom up, even when there
> are literally dozens of replies going on for pages and pages in a single
> email message. In other newsgroups to which I belong, such as
> rec.motorcycles.harley, you will get flamed unmercifully if you top post.
>
> If the suggested norm is to bottom post and cut out extraneous material to
> make it easier to sift through, then I'm happy to oblige.
>
> EZ

Both Thunderbird and Outlook Express place the cursor at the top of the
message, when you hit "reply." 1) Does that imply that the standard is
to post at the top? 2) Is there a way to have the cursor go to just
above the .sig?

--
---Nonnymus---
You don’t stand any taller by
trying to make others appear shorter.