convicted neighbor Haskell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Olrik wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...05cf494192430?
> >
> > > > Your being confused about the identity of dear diabetic neighbor
> > > > FR ...
> >
> > > No, I'm not. FR is a good person, whereas you're a fraudulent,
> > > narcissistic imbecile of the highest order.
> >
> > Name-calling simply shows that you remain convicted by the Holy
> > Spirit:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>
> It's not name-calling if two doctors concur. It's a diagnosis.

Name-calling is not a diagnosis:

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/name-calling

Your difficulties with the proper application of straightforward
definitions does not bode well for your level of cognitive
functioning.

A contrast-enhanced MRI remains wise for you.

May GOD bless you.

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

"Unlike the 2PD-OMER Approach, weight loss diets can't be combined
with well-balanced diets."
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth