>>As soon as Vietnam War ended, so did the counterculture movement, although
there are indeed remnants still around today.<<
Food was one of the most enduring legacies of the 60s. The movement to
"natural" food quickly spread (I have an all-organic recipe in a far-right
religious pamphlet of the mid 70s) and continues to play out.
--
-Mark H. Zanger
author, The American History Cookbook, The American Ethnic Cookbook for
Students
www.ethnicook.com
www.historycook.com
"ASmith1946" > wrote in message
...
> This may be just a semantic difference. There were certainly food reform
> efforts in America before the 1960s and to some extent every reform effort
is
> countercultural by definition.
>
> But the term "counterculture" was raised to specifically describe a broad
> phenomena that began in the '60. It wasn't really a food reform effort,
at
> least it wasn't like Graham's or Kellogg's previous efforts. It was a
political
> movement -- with the anti-Vietnam War being the driving force. It
certainly had
> social and economic dimensions-- the attempt to create a better world
through
> communal living and the destruction (or replacement) of the capitalist
economic
> system. Food was just a side order.
>
> As soon as Vietnam War ended, so did the counterculture movement, although
> there are indeed remnants still around today.
>
> Recent food fights-- re GMOs and globalization-- do have some similar
> characteristcs as did the efforts during the '60s and '70s, which is why I
> added them to my original list.
>
> However, I'm tempted now, due to Bob's comments, to just define
counterculture
> food as what happened during the '60s and 70s.
>
> Many, many thanks to all who have commented.
>
> Andy Smith
>
> >
> >>Counterculture food started in America during the late sixties and early
> >>seventies.
> >
> >I don't think so. Note Pastorio's mention of Kellogg and Graham, who
> >were certainly "counterculture" in America in the 19th century. Here's
> >an interesting reference:
> >
>
>
>