Pinnochio Mojo wrote:
>> THIS is what you're glossing over and ignoring.
>
> Aha! Blaming the deaths of animals and wildlife on as yet undescribed
> agricultural practices and farming methods.

The agricultural practices and farming methods are very
well described. Every scrap of your food is produced
by these animal-killing methods, too.


> What garbage.

No. You don't have a refutation for it.


> You're going to have to provide a better example than this. This is
> just a variation on the "X amount of dead mouses in a wheelbarrow"
> argument. But i see your ad hoc exclusionary principle is hard at work
> here. One, this willful ignorance doesn't apply to omnivores

Sure it does, stupid. The difference is, omnivores
aren't claiming to eat a "death-free" diet, like all
the sanctimonious hypocritical "vegans" do.

> But more importantly... two, your statements seem rather crass, dull
> and inconsiderate considering the billions and billions of animals
> that die each year, just to end up as a source of food.

Your willful ignorance seems even more crass and
inconsiderate, considering that omnivores at least get
some use out of the animals on their plates, while the
billions of animals killed to put rice in your gut are
simply slaughtered and left to rot in the fields.


>> The big problem with "vegans" and "veganism" is the
>> willful blindness to reality.
>
> Just because i don't "accept" your version of reality,

You have no valid reason to reject it. The only reason
you do is that it doesn't agree with your
self-flattering, ego-driven narcissistic view of yourself.


> doesn't mean
> that i suffer from your sad and sorry type of willful blindness.

The willful blindness, kid, is ALLLLLLLLL on your side.


> So obviously there is no "big" problem with vegans and veganism.

There sure is! Your entire basis for your belief in
your virtue is bogus.