On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:13:24 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>>
>>
>> >"Charbucks" is a common slander. It's deserved.
>> >
>> Only by people who don't know dark roast from dirty dishwater.
>
>I have never had a problem with Starbucks coffee. I object to their
>smallest size being so large, for using pretentious names for like "tall"
>instead of (not so ) small, and being so expensive. I object to their
>limited seating being taken up by loiters who buy one over priced coffee
>and sit there for three hours reading or doing homework. But I don't think
>their coffee is bad.
>
I agree, their terminology is silly.... but maybe that's how they got
noncoffee drinkers to notice them.




--
See return address to reply by email