sf wrote:
>
>
> >"Charbucks" is a common slander. It's deserved.
> >
> Only by people who don't know dark roast from dirty dishwater.

I have never had a problem with Starbucks coffee. I object to their
smallest size being so large, for using pretentious names for like "tall"
instead of (not so ) small, and being so expensive. I object to their
limited seating being taken up by loiters who buy one over priced coffee
and sit there for three hours reading or doing homework. But I don't think
their coffee is bad.

I can go into Tim Hortons and get a medium size good cup of good coffee and
a decent muffin for $2.29 and have a place to sit down to enjoy it, or pay
over $4 for a Starbucks coffee and a mediocre muffin, if they have any, and
then find that after waiting an eternity to be served that there is no
place to sit.