kylet@ s h o r e . n e t (Kyle Tucker) wrote in message news:<cpJhb.732864$uu5.124718@sccrnsc04>...
> In article >,
> I'd think with only 1 year of use it would be in pretty decent
> shape. If so, take into consideration what's available today
> and the price. For instance, if a similar Viking or Wolf unit is
> $4K (a guess), I'd be more than willing to pay $2500 for the
> Garland, knowing how good it is. Speaking for myself of course.
> And the comment regarding it being better to NOT have sealed
> burners is correct. I can't address the self cleaning aspect,
> but would just consider this one more thing that could break.

Thanks much for the response. One question:

Why is it better not to have sealed burners? My parents are saying its fabulous.

Gary