|
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|
|
Clarification
In article om>,
says...
>
> For purposes of disclosure, I have a financial interest in a wine
>distributor that serves Ohio and Kentucky.
[SNIP full disclosure]
I'd vote for the TN's. Maybe a short "signature" with a brief disclaimer,
would suffice - for me, it would.
I do not care where the TN's come from, only that they are unbiased and free
of advertising "puff." If you are in the business, and have a good grasp of
wine appraisal, I welcome your comments. One can never know all wines, or all
producers. Though we try, there are too many, and too many new ones, every
month. If you are tasting, and reporting on wines, that I have not had the
pleasure of sampling, then I will read your notes, and then look for the ones
that sound interesting. If I find that your tastes, and mine, do not mesh
(happens all the time), I can still use your notes to tell me what NOT to buy.
I would urge that you take a look at DaleW's TN's, as to how wines should be
"rated." I care more for the elements, that I am likely to find, and their
integration, or lack there of, than in #'s.
As with DaleW's comment, this is only one vote, but it is in your favor.
Hunt
|