Theoric The Squinter wrote:
> "2nz" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>>
>> mc wrote:
>>> 2nz wrote:
>>>> Head Shot wrote:
>>>>> would you like pot with that? wrote:
>>>>>> The officers ate about half of their burgers before discovering
>>>>>> marijuana on the meat, the lawsuit said. They used a field test
>>>>>> kit to
>>>>>> confirm the substance was pot, then went to a hospital for
>>>>>> medical evaluations.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK; now granted that was not a cool thing for the idiotic BK
>>>>> employees to
>>>>> do; but they went to a hospital because they ate a little weed?
>>>>> That's a
>>>>> little excessive; no?
>>>>
>>>> You bet it is.
>>>
>>> Oh please, I would've done the same thing. A stranger taints your
>>> food and you're a cop, I'd wanna know WTH else might be in there.
>>
>> Agreed. But is a lawsuit for aggravated battery justified?
>>
> At the very least it's justified. You can't have drive in
> restaurants where jerk offs put whatever they want on a burger.
> Otherwise the next time it may be acid etc.

(ridiculous cross-postings snipped)

Exactly. The idiots have no right to tamper with food under any
circumstances. Doesn't matter if they thought they were being cute or
whatever other reason they may have had. But I think the employees should
be the ones sued. Unless their manager was complicit in their actions, BK
itself really isn't at fault. (Of course, minimum wage BK employees don't
have any money to cough up.)

Jill