DaleW wrote:
> I don't see anything objectionable or in need of improvement. Of
> course, Google seems to have truncated -I only can see through part of
> section 3.

Nope, that's just all I've got at the moment. Google is innocent of any
wrongdoing here.

>
> You might add winezap.com as an alternative to winesearcher (I strongly
> prefer winesearcher, but might be nice to offer an alternative to
> listing one commercial venture)

OK

>
> Would you like me to try and pull together a food-wine matching list?
> I'd try to depend less on my opinions than as much consensus as can be
> found at that (contentious) subject.

Sounds great to me! Have at it, old boy.

>
> I also think a link to the new users newsgroup, or a basic netiquette
> site, should be part of a FAQ.

New users newsgroup? Huh?
>
> thanks for all your work
>

NP

Mark Lipton