"Curly Sue" > wrote

> On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:23:47 -0400, "Monmouth Internet Newsgroups"
> > wrote:

>>Amuses me when people say that. What does she possibly have
>>that a gazillion other people don't have in far greater quantities, yet
>>the people you refer to aren't jealous of them.

> OTOH, it amazes me that people post nasty comments about her (like
> this subject). I find Paula Deen's mannerisms and recipes very
> unappealing yet I have no need to post any articles detailing what I
> think about her on rfc. If I don't change the channel it's my own
> fault.

For myself, it's interesting to me when people notice the same things
that I do.

But I have never said anything nasty about her. I find her far more
watchable in her $40 and travels show. I can't watch 30 minute or
Inside Dish, she's incredibly grating to me in those.

> I'm willing to consider that it's not jealousy that drives people
> insane over RR, but then, what is the impulse? Sandra Lee at least is
> funny

A scream. Same deal, it's funny to me to see if other people notice
the same things.

I think Rachael invites comment in the way that Emeril used to in his
heyday; complete overexposure, you couldn't get away from her at
one point, if you wanted to watch FoodTV. Just a theory. Why do
some people get all the attention, good or bad. It happens.

nancy