Skanky the low-paid scut-work high-absenteeism "worker" blabbered:
> Leif Erikson wrote:
> > Skanky the low-paid scut-work high-absenteeism "worker"
> > blabbered:
>
> I see you can't go more than a minute without resorting to insults and
> false claims.

The description is accurate.


> > > Leif Erikson wrote:
> > >
> > >>Karen Winter, who used to post as 'rat' and now posts
> > >>as <bleagh> 'glorfindel', deliberately misrepresented:
> > >>
> > >>>chico chupacabra wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>pearl wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>>You approve of people 'diddling' large animals.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>I approve of agriculture;
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>You approve of people "diddling" animals
> > >>
> > >>No. There's no sexual gratification dimension to
> > >>artificial insemination.
> > >
> > >
> > > There was also no sexual gratification for Karen Winter when she allowed
> > > the bird to do its thing.
>
> You've edited my quote. I actually said "...for Glorfindel..."

Her name is Karen Winter. She's a near-sociopath living in an unholy
union with another even worse slag named Sylvia Stevens. They live in
a trailer park on Calle Mejia in Santa Fe, NM. I'm not sure, but I
believe they are in the process of shopping for a new church.


> > There was apparent sexual gratification for the bird,
> > and Karen was making herself a part of the bird's sex life.
>
> There is definite sexual gratification for a 'milked' bull,

No.


> and the ranchers make themselves a part of the bull's sex life.

No. The bull doesn't have a sex life, and the bull's sexual
gratification is of no concern to the ranchers at all.


> > > She only said that she thought it was sweet
> > > that the bird was getting some enjoyment
> >
> > Karen was an active and willing participant in
> > trans-species sexual gratification. Artificial
> > insemination of livestock isn't about sexual
> > gratification at all.
>
> It is for the bull being 'milked'.

No.

Didn't you ever watch "A Boy and His Dog"?


> > >>>>I disapprove of humans getting their jollies by sexually abusing animals
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>Which does not include me.
> > >>
> > >>It *does* include you, along with your cockatiel.
> > >
> > >
> > > At no point did Karen Winter indicate that she got jollies from it,
> >
> > She clearly was enjoying it.
>
> Only in a non-sexual (for her) way.

False. Karen's prurient interest was very much in play.