Karen Winter, who used to post at 'rat' and now posts
as <bleagh> 'glorfindel', deliberately misrepresented:
> chico chupacabra wrote:
>
>> pearl wrote:
>
>
>>> You approve of people 'diddling' large animals.
>
>
>> I approve of agriculture;
>
>
> You approve of people "diddling" animals

No. There's no sexual gratification dimension to
artificial insemination.


> as long as people can make money doing it.

Making money is moral. Animal agriculture is moral.
Artificial insemination of livestock animals is not
"diddling" them, and has no sexual gratification
dimension to it. You know this - you are choosing to
misrepresent the facts. Deliberate misrepresentation
is unethical.


> You have no moral
> objection to what you are calling "bestiality".

Yes, he does.


> This is because you have no concern for the animals
> themselves.

The concern is for humans.


>> I disapprove of humans getting their jollies by sexually abusing animals
>
>
> Which does not include me.

It *does* include you, along with your cockatiel.