mikejames wrote:
> chico chupacabra wrote:
>
> > defended bestiality advocate Karen Winter:
> >
> >> chico chupacabra wrote:
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> chico chupacabra wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Archie Bunker wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Is it the sentiment among Episcopalians that sex with small
> >>>>>>>> animals is included in this "sexual immorality" which St Paul
> >>>>>>>> tells the church in Corinth to flee? Or is this kind of behavior
> >>>>>>>> okay now since the Holy Spirit has obviated most of the Pauline
> >>>>>>>> Epistles? Would your parish object if she brought one of her
> >>>>>>>> little "friends" with her to church the same way she has her
> >>>>>>>> FAS-defective ******* partner, and maybe even got its jollies
> >>>>>>>> with her during, say, vespers? Or is it all perfectly reasonable
> >>>>>>>> for "anglo catholics" to "glorify God" in their bodies and
> >>>>>>>> spirits by diddling with critters?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Discuss.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I guess I better stop letting the dog hump my leg..or should I say
> >>>>>> ankle since he is a chihuahua. HA HA HA HA
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The issue according to Karen is whether your dog has a "preference"
> >>>>> for sex with your leg, ankle, or humans in general, over and above a
> >>>>> preference for sex with other dogs. I've never known a dog to have a
> >>>>> foot/ankle/lower leg fetish, aside from eating up shoes on
> >>>>> occasion. If your chihuahua prefers sex with your ankle or with
> >>>>> you, then she thinks it's perfectly acceptable for you to "cuddle
> >>>>> up with it on the couch" and alienate your human companionship for
> >>>>> a little animal sex:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ...[S]ome animals don't want a mate of their own species,
> >>>>> just as some humans don't. We may think it is better for a human to
> >>>>> get out, mingle with other humans, find a human partner.
> >>>>> But some humans just want to curl up on the couch or go out hiking
> >>>>> with their companion dog or cat. I think we need to respect
> >>>>> such personal preferences. As long as no *harm* is being
> >>>>> done to another, we have no right to tell another human, OR another
> >>>>> non-human, how to live his/her life, or who to live it with.
> >>>>> http://tinyurl.com/m7ff8
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BTW and nevermind sex, have you ever considered hiking with a CAT? I
> >>>>> don't know where she comes up with her examples, but I guess it's
> >>>>> to be expected from someone who feels special and that it was
> >>>>> "sweet" that a bird got off in her hand.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> just kidding! It does seem a bit odd letting an animal get off on
> >>>>>> your hand.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *Very* odd, and thanks for your reply. Anyone else out there think
> >>>>> it's a bit queer? Anyone care to defend Karen, her "regularly"
> >>>>> having sexual relations with a small animal, and/or bestiality in
> >>>>> general?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If what you say about her is true,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> It is. Click on the links and you can read her posts that I
> >>> quoted yourself.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> she needs prayer not personal attacks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> To paraphrase St James,
> >>> If one of you says to her, "Go, I wish you well; keep warm and
> >>> stop molesting animals," but does nothing about her *real*
> >>> [mental health] needs, what good is it?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Joh 8:7 - So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and
> >>>> said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a
> >>>> stone at her.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ...Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn
> >>> thee: GO, AND *SIN NO MORE*.
> >>> John 8:11
> >>>
> >>> She needs more than prayer, and she's the least bit embarrassed by
> >>> jacking off a little bird.
> >>>
> >>> ...I think we made his last years as happy as was possible for
> >>> him... If he wanted to use my hand as a sex toy, I wasn't going
> >>> to forbid him.
> >>> http://tinyurl.com/p4vrc
> >>>
> >>> I thought it was rather sweet, in fact. He certainly was a
> >>> happier bird with me than with the other 'tiels.
> >>> http://tinyurl.com/rvyua
> >>>
> >>> Look up her old posts when she used her "rat" pseudonym on the issue of
> >>> zoophilia and you'll find she's an impenitent apologist for the
> >>> practice of animal molestation.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Glad you are without sin. Can you walk
> >> on water also?
> >
> >
> > I haven't tried lately.
> >
> >> Mt 7:1 - Judge not, that ye be not judged.
> >
> >
> > How can you avoid that which you don't judge?
> > Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and
> > offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and
> > avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus
> > Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches
> > deceive the hearts of the simple.
> > Romans 16:17-18
> >
> > How can you separate from those involved in outwardly sinful lifestyles
> > if you ignore their sin?
> > Come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord
> > 2 Corinthians 6:17
> >
> > Why would you ignore the darkness and have fellowship with it?
> > And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness,
> > but rather reprove them.
> > Ephesians 5:1 1
> >
> > Etc.
> I have been reading your posts. I do not feel inclined to check out the
> leads to your madness.
>
> Get help.

Hey, we can agree on something,
he does need help. When someone
resorts to personal attacks instead
of debating ideas, INMOHO they
fail to understand reasoned debate.

Jim