"chico chupacabra" insane liar and traitor > wrote in message ...

> pearl wrote:
>
> >>>>I'm not the one diddling small animals. You approve of that kind of thing?
> >>>
> >>>You approve of people 'diddling' large animals.
> >>
> >>I approve of agriculture;
> >
> > You approve of people 'diddling' large animals. You're sunk.
>
> agriculture.

People 'diddling' large animals.

Glorfindel wrote:

"Like most conservatives, Leif and Chico condone anything which brings
in money. They have no objection if billions of beings live in boredom
and misery, and die in agony. They have no objection to "bestiality"
at all as long as somebody makes a profit on it. But allow a crippled
little creatures a bit of harmless pleasure in his old age, and, if it
involves genitalia, they go off into hysterical bellows of hypocritical
and pretended outrage.

I think artificial insemination of animals is completely immoral,
perverse, unnatural, and depraved. It is only done for the
greed or vanity of humans who have no concern for the animals
involved as individuals at all. "

I agree.

> You defend Karen Winter, who diddles small, defenseless
> animals for *her* and (so she claims) *their* *pleasure*. Stop comparing
> applesranges and stop taking up for The Side.

You're a dirty liar. I'm reposting what Glorfindel wrote:

chico chupacabra wrote:

<snip>

> Glorfindel's allowing "her" bird to please himself wasn't for any
> commercial or reproductive purpose.

That's absolutely true. It was for him, and completely his
own idea, not mine. I got nothing out of it except the
satisfaction of letting him do what he wanted to do, in a
way which harmed neither of us.

> She saw it as "sweet" and gets off
> on the idea that the bird liked her more than it liked other birds.

I think it is very sad that the experiences in his earlier
life had crippled him emotionally and psychologically as well
as physically. He was damaged in his mind as well as in his
body by what had been done to him by others before he came to
live with me. I wanted to do the best I could for him, given
his disabilities, and I think I succeeded.

And you do realize that you have just reversed yourself on
your original claim on this subject, and admitted you were
wrong. You now agree with what I said at the beginning.
What an idiot. You have no real knowledge of animal
behavior, you reversed your false scientific claim without
even admitting you were wrong, and, as usual, you invented
phony charges cloaked in equally phony spasms of fake moral
disapproval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is what you're REALLY at, traitor chico:

'witch-hunt also witch hunt (wich'hunt')
n.