On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:20:44 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:

>
><dh@.> wrote
>> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 10:34:14 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>[..]
>
>>>I know what the dictionary definition of consideration is, I am requiring
>>>that you define rigorously exactly what and in what fashion you are
>>>demanding we "consider" instead of wildly equivocating between
>>>consideration
>>>of "existence" and "coming into existence".
>>>
>>>>>not existing.
>>>>
>>>> I consider their lives, and you admittedly can not.
>>>
>>>Describe that process of consideration in detail, and I don't mean quote
>>>the
>>>dictionary.
>>
>> Think about what the animals lives are like, and consider whether
>> or not we believe the experiences they have would be more likely
>> to give life a positive or a negative value to them.
>
>That is one meaning of "life", considering the quality of their lives, aka
>AW,

So do you only have trouble understanding the other meaning that
I've pointed out to you?

>it doesn't imply the LoL.

The LoL requires it. There's more to it, but that much alone is more
than you'll ever be able to appreciate or be honest enough to acknowledge.