FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

[email protected]

chico chupacabra wrote:
> wrote:
>
> > chico chupacabra wrote:
> >
> >>Karen Winter, former house-whore of the Society for Creative
> >>Anachronisms commune, wrote:
> >>
> >><...>
> >>
> >>>>>You keep confirming the fact that you're pro-bestiality.
> >>>
> >>>>No. You just keep intentionally mis-interpreting what I'm saying.
> >>>
> >>>*Intentionally* is the key word.
> >>
> >>No, Karen. Lesley has repeatedly equivocated on the issue. She's written
> >>that it's a perversion but should be tolerated; she's written that it's
> >>okay as long as it doesn't involve conditioning or coercion and then
> >>failed to respond appropriately when asked when it does NOT involve
> >>conditioning or coercion; she's written that it's nobody else's business
> >>if someone ****s an animal even though she finds it patently offensive
> >>if someone eats an animal.
> >>
> >>
> >>>He knows you condemn it;
> >>
> >>One doesn't condone what one condemns; the two are mutually exclusive.
> >>Lesley condones bestiality. She doesn't condemn it. She has only offered
> >>qualified objections to it while firmly insisting that it be legal.
> >>
> >><...>
> >>
> >>>Having been a vegetarian for over 20 years,
> >>
> >>You have not been. Your depraved FAS-defective sidekick Sylvia wrote
> >>that you had chiles rellenos when you returned to Santa Fe.
> >>
> >>
> >>>I would gag at the thought of eating any meat,
> >>
> >>You should gag at the thought of munching that old bat's carpet.
> >>

Her sexual activities are none of your business, you disgusting
homophobe.

> >>
> >>>even roadkill.
> >>
> >>Even? *Especially* roadkill.
> >>
> >>
> >>>But I would not want
> >>>to pass a law forbidding people to eat roadkill
> >>
> >>What about those who want to eat normal meat? Why do you object to that
> >>in a manner similar to my objections to bestiality and pedophilia,
> >>Karen? What is it about eating meat or wearing leather or fur that's
> >>less noble than sexually assaulting a minor or a defenseless animal?
> >
> >
> > Surely you can not be so stupid as to be unaware of what she thinks the
> > morally relevant difference is.
>
> I want her to answer the questions and explain why she finds it morally
> acceptable for someone to sexually abuse an animal but not to eat it.
> Feel free to give it a stab yourself, numbnuts.

Not if that's going to be your level of courtesy. As I say, I really
cannot comprehend how you could fail to grasp what her answer would be.
I will explain it to you if you're prepared to be civil.