Skanky wrote:

> > >>Animals aren't sexually oriented toward humans.
> >
> > > While I'm completely against all bestiality, there are exceptions to
> > > the above quote. Some pet animals use (or try to use) their owners to
> > > masturbate/mate with. There are dogs that hump legs, birds that try to
> > > hump human hands, and even a cat I've heard of that wanks off on its
> > > owner's leg. If the human involved does NOT feel sexual about the
> > > animal, yet allows it to do this, it puts them in a bit of a grey area.
> > > It may be completely gross that a person lets their pet do this to
> > > them, but is it immoral? I'm unsure.
> >
> > Why would it be immoral?
>
> I guess it isn't.

What would be moral about letting it have its way with you or any part of your body?

> Just grosses me out.

That pervert Karen got off on it.

> > I lived with a cockatiel who regularly masturbated on my hand.
> > Poor little guy, he was never going to have another bird as a mate,
> > he was quite old when I adopted him, and he was definitely oriented
> > toward humans. Why should I make his last few years less pleasant
> > for him by denying him this release, when it did him no harm, and it
> > did me no harm?
>
> I used to have a cockatiel who kept trying to do that to me.

That was the last decent date you had, too, Skanky.