On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:54:17 +0100, "William" > wrote:
><dh@.> pointed out:
>
>> If we Google Goo, we find that he is:
>> __________________________________________________ _______
>> Web Results 1 - 10 of about 499 for Goobernicus Gonad. (0.51 seconds)
>> [...]
>> Goobernicus Gonad - - the moron who thinks he's a genius and enjoys
>> being referred to simply as " Goo " - -
>> [...]
>> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>> In his dishonest attempts to promote his own dishonesty, Goo has
>> pretended to be the following people agreeing with himself, *plus*
>> what is likely to be an even longer list that we're not yet aware of:
>>
>> Jonathan Ball
>> Citizen
>> Benfez
>> Wilson Woods
>> Radical Moderate
>> Bingo
>> Edward
>> George
>> Bill
>> Fred
>> Mystery Poster
>> Merlin the dog
>> Bob the dog
>>
>> elvira
>> Dieter
>> "Dieter "
>> >
>> Abner Hale
>> Roger Whitaker
>> ****tard
>> Apoo
>> Ted Bell
>>
>> Jay Santos
>>
>> Rudy Canoza
>> Trappist
>>
>> Leif Erikson
>> S. Maizlich
>> SlipperySlope
>> Eden
>> Sylvia Stevens
>>
>I remember some of those names. Are they all him?
Yes "they"--and probably as many more--are the same
desperate and contemptible poster.
>Who's Goo?
It's a way of referring to the desperate and contemptible
poster without rewarding his dishonesty by pretending along
with him that he's many different people, and without insulting
ourselves by rewarding Goo for the dishonest trick. When I
first saw Goo posting he was pretending to be "Jonathan Ball"
and then he went on to the others, plus the ones I'm not aware
of. Goo often posts as several different people in the same
thread. There's no reason to reward his dishonest tricks after
we become aware of them. One thing Goo can't escape from
is the fact that he thinks he's very intelligent, so "Goobernicus"
fits the moron perfectly, and it's an easy way of referring to this
one particularly dishonest individual pretending to be many.
>> Goo claims to have some sort of honorary PhD from somewhere,
>> reportedly in dishonesty and idiotics. Whether or not there's any
>> element of truth to it, the Goober has certainly displayed himself in
>> a dishonest and idiotic manner a number of times:
>> __________________________________________________ _______
>> Ron asked:
>>>So you are telling us that the cow was purposely bred into existance
>>>and fed and watered for 12 years only to be sold at the lowest price in
>>>the beef industry......and all that done with the singular purpose of
>>>supplying the pet food industry?
>>
>> Goo replied:
>> Yes.
>>
>> Message-ID: et>
>> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>> __________________________________________________ _______
>> Ron pointed out:
>>>You also said cows are raised for 12 years specifically to become
>>>PET FOOD.
>>
>> Goo replied:
>> Some are.
>>
>> Message-ID: .com>
>> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>> "Dogs NEVER anticipate, nor do cats, or cattle, or
>> any other animal you've ever encountered." - Goo
>>
>> "Animals do not experience frustration." - Goo
>>
>> "Darwin, a sentimental person, was projecting. He
>> saw something that wasn't there. He was, in a way,
>> hallucinating." - Goo
>>
>> "No zygotes, animals, people, or any other living thing
>> benefits from coming into existence. No farm animals
>> benefit from farming." - Goo
>>
>> "Causing animals to be born and "get to experience life"
>> . . . is no mitigation at all for killing them." - Goo
>>
>> "the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
>> than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo
>>
>> "When considering your food choices ethically, assign
>> ZERO weight to the morally empty fact that choosing to
>> eat meat causes animals to be bred into existence." - Goo
>>
>> "I have examined the question at length, and feel
>> there is only one reasonable conclusion: life, per se,
>> is not a benefit." - Goo
>>
>> "Being born is not a benefit in any way. It can't be." - Goo
>>
>> "Animals cannot be or feel disappointed." - Goo
>>
>> "Non human animals experience neither pride nor
>> disappointment. They don't have the mental ability
>> to feel either." - Goo
>>
>> "Anticipation requires language." - Goo
>>
>> "No animals anticipate." - Goo
>>
>> "The dog didn't do what Darwin said. His statement of
>> the "changes in behavior" is not reliable." - Goo
>>
>> "Dogs, cats, cattle, almost all animals "lower" than
>> the great apes have no sense of self." - Goo
>>
>> "They are not aware that they can see. " - Goo
>>
>> "They are *not* aware that they can smell." - Goo
>>
>> "The fact of the matter is, with 135,000,000 cats and
>> dogs in the U.S., the food to feed them simply cannot
>> be "leftovers" from the animals bred to feed humans." - Goo
>>
>> "Ranchers . . . have no idea if a steer they raise is
>> going to be used entirely for human consumption,
>> entirely for animal consumption, or for some
>> combination; nor do they care." - Goo
>>
>> "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be
>> pet food. " - Goo
>>
>> "I'm right about all of it." - Goo
>> "I can explain myself in logical and coherent terms" - Goo
>> "Why are you laughing at mental illness" - Goo
>> "I'm not stupid." - Goo
>> "I know exactly what I think" - Goo
>> "I educated the public" - Goo
>> "I haven't made any absurd claims" - Goo