Lesley, perverted foot-rubbing shithead from Eire, wrote:

> > > > > > >>><snip>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>And just to be clear, you *do* endorse bestiality:
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> *As long as the feelings are mutual*,
> > > > > > >>>>>> and there's *no coercion or force involved,* why
> > > > > > >>>>>> should you be concerned? Personally, I have no
> > > > > > >>>>>> problem with people's personal choices *as long as
> > > > > > >>>>>> they don't harm or cause distress to another*- be it
> > > > > > >>>>>> human or animal. [emphasis in original]
> > > > > > >>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/dwzj7
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>>>From an AR point of view. What people do in the privacy of
> > > > > > > their own home may be sick as hell, but as long as they're not
> > > > > > > harming or causing distress to another - that's their business.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So you endorse it. You don't condemn it. Saying it's
> > > > > > "their business" is endorsement of it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Saying it is sick as hell is condemnation.
> > > >
> > > > No.
> > >
> > > Of course it is condemnation.
> >
> > No.
>
> Of course it is condemnation.

You wrote yesterday, "Whether I think there should be a law against it is another question." That CONDONES it, it doesn't condemn it.

> condemnation
> 1. an expression of strong disapproval; pronouncing
> as wrong or morally culpable

Yet you still find it in your heart to condone it: "Whether I think there should be a law against it is another question."

> > We're not talking about any states. We're talking about YOU. You
> > endorse bestiality.
>
> No I don't.

I. You offer qualified objections to it:
*As long as the feelings are mutual*,
and there's *no coercion or force involved,* why
should you be concerned? Personally, I have no
problem with people's personal choices *as long as
they don't harm or cause distress to another*- be it
human or animal. [emphasis in original]
lesley ("liesley") - http://tinyurl.com/dwzj7

II. You've condoned it as a matter of privacy:
"What people do in the privacy of their own home may be sick as hell, but as long as they're not harming or causing distress to another - that's their business."

III. You've further stated that you'd even oppose laws against it:
"Whether I think there should be a law against it is another question."

Whose side are you on, Lesley? The animal ****ers' side.

> And, like many, I don't believe that I've
> the right to interfere with others' choices

Unless they want to EAT an animal instead of **** it. You have a perverted sense of right and wrong, pervert.