to each their own.


that's as bad as vegans forcing their pets to eat a vegan diet.



Arthur Brain wrote:
> dd wrote:
> > The right to life is possible only in a certain, different atmosphere that
>
> There is no such right.
>
> > is not present on the earth at the moment. Animals are killed, birds are
> > killed, sea animals are killed, just for game. You don't have any reverence
>
> So? Whereever there is life, there must also - inevitably - be death.
>
> There is no reason why we shouldn't kill plants or animals if it suits
> us.
>
> > for life. And life is the same whether it is in human beings or in other
> > forms. Unless man becomes aware of his violence towards animals, birds, he
> > cannot be really alert about his own right to life. If you are not caring
>
> There is no such right.
>
> > about others' lives, what right have you got to demand the same right for
> > yourself?
>
> Human rights only apply to animals in Cloud Cuckoo Land.
>
> Do *you* live in Cloud Cuckoo Land?
>
> > But the whole of humanity is non-vegetarian; they are all eating other life
> > forms. There is no reverence for life as such. Unless we create an
> > atmosphere of reverence for life, man cannot realize the goal of getting his
> > fundamental right of life.
>
> So what are you gong to eat, if you can't eat "other life forms"?
>
> sand?
>
> Verbal diarrhea?