On Fri, 19 May 2006 14:14:51 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>On 17 May 2006, Goo hilariously continues insisting that he disagrees with himself:
>
>>****wit David Harrison, ignorant dog-sodomizing lying cracker, lied:
>>> On 15 May 2006, Goo hilariously continues insisting that he disagrees with himself:
>>>
>>> >****wit David Harrison, ignorant dog-sodomizing lying cracker, lied:
>>> >> On Wed, 10 May 2006, Goo hilariously continues insisting that he disagrees with himself:
>>> >>
>>> >> >****wit David Harrison, ignorant dog-sodomizing lying cracker, lied:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Then exactly how do you think you disagree with yourself that:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> "no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
>>> >> >> of the animals erases all of it."
>>> >> >
>>> >> >I didn't write that.
>>> >>
>>> >> You sure did
>>> >
>>> >I didn't write what you posted.
>>> __________________________________________________ _______
>>> From: Goo
>>
>>No such poster.
>
> LOL! Goo hilariously claims that he doesn't exist.
>
>>No one wrote what you claimed someone wrote. You made it up. Post the
>>complete, unedited and IN-CONTEXT quote of what someone wrote
>
>Here it is again Goo:
>_________________________________________________ ________
>From: Goo
>Message-ID: . net>
>Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:33:13 GMT
>
>dh wrote:
>
>> You obviously don't want people to consider contributing
>> to decent lives for livestock over the elimination objective
>...
>
>3. Because you have not addressed the real complaints
> of "vegans" regarding human use of animals:
>...
>
> b. no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the
> deliberate killing of the animals erases all of it.
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>Why are you ashamed of what you wrote, and how are you now claiming to
>disagree with yourself, if you think you do?

Goo? Why???

>Remember Goober that WHEN
>you AGAIN fail to explain how you disagree with yourself, it will again
>be convincing evidence that you don't. If you simply deny writing what
>you wrote again, it will be yet more convincing evidence that you're totally
> inept AND that you don't disagree with yourself. You REALLY do suck at this,
>Goo.