FoodBanter.com - View Single Post - Oven 'barbecued' memphis style dry ribs

Kevin S. Wilson

On Thu, 25 May 2006 12:47:08 -0400, wrote:

>On Thu, 25 May 2006 10:37:58 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson >
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:51:15 GMT, Dan Krueger
> wrote:
>>
>>>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 24 May 2006 00:32:33 GMT, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On 23-May-2006, "Keep on Plonkin'" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ah, another AFB "classic-in-the-making"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>How long will this thread stay alive and off-topic? Will the flames rise
>>>>>>higher than a creosote fire in a 55 gallon grill? Will the "bugg"-ery
>>>>>>continue? Will someone invoke Hitler and racism?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Stay tuned. . .
>>>>>>
> wrote in message
.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 22-May-2006, Ringo > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 22 May 2006 10:29:13 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Abe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Perhaps you will have the balls to identify yourself. Perhaps not.
>>>>>If not, then **** off. We know who we are. You don't seem to know
>>>>>who we are. Yet you are actively badmouthing people who have
>>>>>the ability to seek you out and do you harm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nice threat. And here I thought it was only Dank who takes
>>>> meaningless, trivial Usenet squabbles to real life.
>>>
>>>Netcop at his finest.
>>
>>How curious. Why doesn't Dank want anyone in AFB to see his replies to
>>posts made in AFB? Why would he send his reply to ARK instead of AFB?
>>
>>Shame, probably. Or maybe he's worried that I'll mention that he's
>>been e-mailing my boss again.
>
>And why is Dank defending Kevin against the netcop? Or is he
>applauding the netcop? Hard to tell whether Dank's post constituted
>sarcasm (as I first assumed) or approval.
>
It's neighter sarcasm nor approval. Both would require far more subtle
thinking than he's capable of. It is, in fact, just more
feces-flinging.

Your mistake was in overlooking Dank's bizarre obsession with me and
his oft-stated assertion that each of his posts is directed at one
person and one person only. Take the two together, and it's dead-on
certain that he was just doing what he always does: Flinging feces in
the form of tediously unfunny "insults" that are barely relevant to
the topic at hand, much less expressed in a manner consistent with the
speech patterns of an educated, literate, adult native speaker of
English.