On Thu, 25 May 2006 10:37:58 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson >
wrote:

>On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:51:15 GMT, Dan Krueger
> wrote:
>
>>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 May 2006 00:32:33 GMT, wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On 23-May-2006, "Keep on Plonkin'" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Ah, another AFB "classic-in-the-making"
>>>>>
>>>>>How long will this thread stay alive and off-topic? Will the flames rise
>>>>>higher than a creosote fire in a 55 gallon grill? Will the "bugg"-ery
>>>>>continue? Will someone invoke Hitler and racism?
>>>>>
>>>>>Stay tuned. . .
>>>>>
> wrote in message
. net...
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 22-May-2006, Ringo > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 22 May 2006 10:29:13 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Abe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Perhaps you will have the balls to identify yourself. Perhaps not.
>>>>If not, then **** off. We know who we are. You don't seem to know
>>>>who we are. Yet you are actively badmouthing people who have
>>>>the ability to seek you out and do you harm.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nice threat. And here I thought it was only Dank who takes
>>> meaningless, trivial Usenet squabbles to real life.
>>
>>Netcop at his finest.
>
>How curious. Why doesn't Dank want anyone in AFB to see his replies to
>posts made in AFB? Why would he send his reply to ARK instead of AFB?
>
>Shame, probably. Or maybe he's worried that I'll mention that he's
>been e-mailing my boss again.

And why is Dank defending Kevin against the netcop? Or is he
applauding the netcop? Hard to tell whether Dank's post constituted
sarcasm (as I first assumed) or approval.

BW