--
Wealth is in the imagination,
riches are in the heart and
magic resides in the soul.
"Rudy Canoza's Empty Skull" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Leif Erikson wrote:
> > impotent fudgepacker homo liar ronnnnnnnnnie hamilton
> > stupidly blabbered:
> >
> > > Leif Erikson wrote:
> > >
> > >>impotent fudgepacker homo liar ronnnnnnnnnie hamilton
> > >>stupidly blabbered:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Leif Erikson wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>impotent fudgepacker homo liar ronnnnnnnnnie hamilton
> > >>>>stupidly blabbered:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>Leif Erikson wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>impotent fudgepacker homo liar ronnnnnnnnnie hamilton
> > >>>>>>stupidly blabbered:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>Leif Erikson wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>****wit David Harrison, ****witted pig-****ing lying
> > >>>>>>>>cracker, stupidly blurted out:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>I am not an extremist about it, and
> > >>>>>>>>>>if I thought that all of the animals I eat had terrible lives,
I
> > >>>>>>>>>>would still eat meat. That is not because I don't care
> > >>>>>>>>>>about them at all, but I would just ignore their suffering.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>Message-ID: >
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> What would you do?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>You stupid, STUPID ****wit: If you "would just ignore
> > >>>>>>>>their suffering", that *MEANS* that you don't care
> > >>>>>>>>about the animals at all in terms of their welfare. It
> > >>>>>>>>is *precisely* becuase you don't care about them at all
> > >>>>>>>>that you would still eat meat, you stupid ****wit.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>He might not care about animal welfare but conclude not to eat
the
> > >>>>>>>putifying flesh of animals due to concerns for his own health.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>You stupid, impotent fudgepacker: didn't you see where
> > >>>>>>he said he *WOULD* still eat the meat?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>How do you know that for a fact
> > >>>>
> > >>>>He wrote it, you stupid impotent homo fudgepacker.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>No. No he didn't
> > >>
> > >>He did, ronnnnnnnnnnie, you impotent homo.
> > >>
> > >> I am not an extremist about it, and if I thought
> > >> that all of the animals I eat had terrible lives, I
> > >> would still eat meat.
> > >>
> > >>He ALREADY DOES eat meat, ronnnnnnnnnnie, you stupid
> > >>impotent limp-wristed no-fight squat-to-**** homo. He
> > >>has been saying for all these years that he cares about
> > >>cruelty to animals, and now we see that he doesn't care
> > >>at all: he would *continue* to eat meat even if he
> > >>knew the animals led terrible lives.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I ****in' *KNOW* that.
> >
> > Debatable.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > What I'm saying is he may choose to NOT eat meat if he becomes
> > > convinced that it is a danger to his own health.
> >
> > Doubtful. He's in his fifties, you stupid ****. His
> > habits are fixed.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >>As for pet food, ronnnnnnnnnnnie: I spoke with a
> > >>consultant for one of the biggest pet food producers in
> > >>the world, a company that has acquired several large
> > >>U.S. producers. He is a personal friend of mine. He
> > >>knows quite a lot about the industry, and he tells me
> > >>the pet food companies just buy meat in the commodity
> > >>markets. It's obviously not the highest grade, but
> > >>there are all kinds of grades available in the markets.
> > >> They do also buy the waste from meat production, but
> > >>quite a lot of the meat is simply "meat". This MEANS,
> > >>ronnnnnnnnnnie, that as part of the demand, they are
> > >>causing more animals to be supplied to the entire market.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I asked if you meant that bovines were being fed, watered,
> >
> > Pet food companies buy meat in the commodities markets,
> > ronnnnnnnnnnie. That is an element of demand, and
> > supply responds to the demand. Extra livestock animals
> > are grown to meet the demand. Whether or not a
> > *specific* animal is bred and raised to be pet food is
> > irrelevant. Extra animals are produced, period.
> > That's all that matters.
> >
> > Pet food does not come solely from the "by-products".
> > Pet food contains a lot of muscle meat.
>
>
>
> From: Goo
> Message-ID: et>
>
> Ron asked:
>
>
>
> So you are telling us that the cow was purposely bred into
> existance and fed and watered for 12 years only to be sold at the
> lowest price in the beef industry......and all that done with the
> singular purpose of supplying the pet food industry?
>
>
> Goo replied:
>
> Yes.

I'm not sure I understand the 12 years? Older animals do not produce quality
meat, these animals go for pet food, chili, soups, stews, hot dogs and other
ground products where quality is not that important. The average age of a
butchered animal is between 2 to maybe 4 years of age, after that the
quality of the meat is usually not marketable in the super market. Unless an
animal has been used extensively for breeding it's life span is very
limited. When it's breeding life is over or if it is unlucky enough to get
mastitis, cancer eye, foot rot, mange, liver flukes, internal parasites,
metal in their stomachs etc then they will usually end ground into something
but not in your local market as a t-bone steak.