Your FDA Says: "No Problem With Benzene In Soft Drinks"
Nice!
"Prunefinger" > wrote in message
. com...
> "John" > wrote in message
> t...
> : I guess what you meant to say is that most FDA employees are not
> Federal
> : employees, but rather civilian employees of a Federal agency.
>
> I said what I intended to say, and the words I chose were appropriate
> to my meaning. That you cannot understand my meaning doesn't really
> matter to me.
>
> : You may be right, but being the "moronic Xian" that I am I wouldn't
> be in a
> : position "judge".
>
> Well, I wouldn't vote for you as judge.
>
> : There are so many Federal agencies I would have to agree with what
> : you actually did say (i.e.. "most Federal employees do not work for
> the
> : FDA").
>
> Hey, how about that, you actually _did_ understand the words. Now, if
> only you could grasp the meaning.
>
> : I don't know why you chose to call me a city in China (XIAN) the
> capital of
> : Shaanxi province. But I'll pout about that later off line.
>
> This is very much the response small children use, before they gain
> any sophistication.
>
> : I find it telling that you find it perfectly acceptable for the
> original
> : poster slipuvalad, which for all I know may be your alias, to write:
> :
> : "If the very politically- and fundamentalist-christian-connected
> : (Republican Party-controlled) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)"
>
> So you disagree? Why didn't you just say so, instead of spewing
> stupidity?
>
> : But I am vilified as, and I quote (1) "Xian witling!" (2) "a moronic
> Xian"
> : (3) "you aren't qualified to judge", for calling him the exact
> opposite of
> : what he called the people responsible for the tests. Let's see, that
> would
> : make you a hmmmm, I don't know maybe HYPOCRITE!
>
> You most assuredly did _not_ call him the opposite of what he said.
> Why don't you find yourself a dictionary? Hypocrite doesn't mean what
> you apparently think it means. I called you what you are. Holding
> superstitious views automatically puts you into the category of
> "incapable of reason".
>
> : My reply was clearly not directed at the blood and guts of the post,
> but
> : rather at the way he chose to word his opening statement, which led
> me to
> : pay no further attention to what might have been an informative
> post.
>
> Liar. You reacted as you did, not because of the wording, but rather
> because you take exception to his belief (well grounded) that the FDA
> is controlled by the right-wings ****tards currently running this
> country (into the ground).
>
> : But of course I'm not "qualified to judge".
>
> About the only thing you've gotten right.
>
> : In closing I respectfully say
> : F*** Off
>
> It's spelled "**** Off", you fool.
>
|