pearl wrote:

> "Leif Erikson" > wrote in message nk.net...
>
>>pearl wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Leif Erikson" > wrote in message oups.com...
>>>
>>>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>If you read the article S. Maizlich posted
>>>>>http://edition.cnn.com/2006/LAW/02/1....ap/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>>The last line says:
>>>>>
>>>>>"Before its acknowledgment Monday, the company had quietly added
>>>>>"Contains wheat and milk ingredients" to the french fries listing on
>>>>>its Web site."
>>>>
>>>>How long before? And why did the left-leaning CNN feel it necessary to
>>>>editorialize "quietly"? Naturally, they don't *say* how long, probably
>>>>because they don't know, but they're clearly trying to create the
>>>>impression that McDonald's did something sneaky. Maybe McD's *did* do
>>>>something sneaky, but CNN doesn't know that, and has no reason to
>>>>believe it...except for their political orientation.
>>>
>>>
>>>The last update edit that shows up on the web archive is "Mar 30, 2005 *" -
>>>http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://...s.in dex.html
>>>
>>>'French Fries:
>>>Potatoes, partially hydrogenated soybean oil, natural flavor (beef source),
>>>dextrose, sodium acid pyrophosphate (to preserve natural color). Cooked
>>>in partially hydrogenated vegetable oils (may contain partially hydrogenated
>>>soybean oil and/or partially hydrogenated corn oil and/or partially
>>>hydrogenated canola oil and/or cottonseed oil and/or sunflower oil and/or
>>>corn oil).
>>
>> the link shown is what it was BEFORE the update.
>
>
> '* denotes when site was updated'. 1. Has it, or has it not
> been updated since Mar 30, 2005?

NO, you goddamned ****ing shit4braincell moron. That
link dated Mar 30 2005 is to what it was BEFORE the
update. There would be no need for them to archive
what it is *now*, you colossal piece of shit, until
it's changed again.