View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan
S. Maizlich S. Maizlich is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Two hypochondriacs and a "vegan" sue McDonald's

Beach Runner wrote:
>
>
> wrote:
>
>> I agree she suffered no real damage and every veggie should ask before
>> ordering. (I do)
>> About the allergy thing, I was saying they should sue based on what I
>> know of allergies. I am an allergy sufferer as well as a vegetarian
>> and I ask a barrage of questions before chowing down. However things
>> can get cross contaminated and a reaction can occur. If they didn't
>> have anti-histamines or epi pens handy, and the allergy is full blown
>> they could die. If the case is that they went to the hospital and
>> nearly died, I can see the law suit having some solid ground.
>>

> This ignores that fact that McDonalds was being purposely dishonest.


How were they? Did they say their fries contain no
wheat or dairy? You don't know that. You don't know
*any* of the facts of the case.


> If they didn't say anything that would be one matter but being purposely
> dishonest is another.


Prove they were being "purposely dishonest".


>
> And if Vegan is a spiritual or moral code for someone, clearly McDonalds
> violated that trust and should be liable.


The "vegan" has no case. You can hold whatever
****witted "spiritual code" you want; it is not
"violated" by McDonald's including dairy in its
products. You do not have a "right" to have your
so-called "spiritual code" respected.