View Single Post
  #246 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,talk.politics.animals,soc.culture.usa
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Status of animals


----- Original Message -----
From: "pearl" >
Newsgroups:
alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,talk. politics.animals,soc.culture.usa
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: The Status of animals


> > wrote in message ...
>
>> (as the Constitution states --

>
> I find it incredible that a poster who votes for Bush "Stop throwing
> the Constitution in my face, It's just a goddamned piece of paper!",
> keeps bringing up the U.S Constitution in response to invitations
> to the American public to exercise their constitutionally protected
> right of freedom of speech, concerning the protection of native
> species, in their own right, and as part of their/our natural heritage.


The word is "Voted." I never said he was perfect. He isn't. I am not voting
for him as we speak so the use of the word "votes" is grammatically
incorrect.

Of course I keep bringing up the Constitution.... is there a reason I
shouldn't. However, I have never said that anyone should not exercise any of
their freedoms. Where did I do so? Exercise away...

>
> I'll have to see you renounce the Bush administrations actions
> as documented below, before believing you're not just using
> the Constitution now because it suits your purposes to do so.


Of course it serves my purpose to do so... I believe in it, am saddened when
it is not followed... and have never suggested it should be any other way.
BTW, it not only serves my purpose, but the other citizens of this great
country to do so. It would never have been written by the group who did so
if it had not served the peoples purpose. Who's purpose should it serve?

<garbage smokescreen begins>
> 'Despite opposition by many prominent Republicans, Dick Cheney
> and George W. Bush are mounting an intensive public relations
> campaign to justify their pre-ordained invasion of Iraq. A preemptive
> strike against Iraq would violate the Constitution and the United Nations
> Charter.

<mercifully snipping the rest of the garbage smokescreen>


> Well... what say you, oscar?


What happened to the national parks, horse, grizzly, animal, vegetable,
mineral discussion?