<dh@.> wrote in message ...
> On 9 Feb 2006 13:43:08 -0800, "Leif Erikson" > wrote:
>
>>
>>dh@. wrote:
>>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:01:06 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> ><dh@.> wrote
>>> >> The Logic of the Larder means decent AW.
>>> >
>>> >No, it doesn't.
>>>
>>> Your hero said it does:
>>>
>>> "when their life is a fairly happy one." - Salt
>>
>>You left a huge part of it off, ****wit - the part that shows the
>>illogic of the larder is *not* about "decent aw":
>>
>> "*IF* such reasoning [that it is better for them to live and to be
>> butchered than not to live at all] justifies the practice of
>> flesh-eating, it must equally justify all breeding of animals for
>> profit or pastime, when their life is a fairly happy one."
>>
>>
>>But you don't demand
>
> The Logic of the Larder means decent AW Goo.

But you don't follow the classic utilitarian LoL where you must take great
care to ensure that their lives are long and happy ****wit, your position
has always been simply that the life they get is better than no life at all.