<dh@.> wrote in message ...
> On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:12:04 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>>
>><dh@.> wrote in message news
>>> On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:29:00 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>><dh@.> wrote in message
m...
>>>
>>>>> You proved once again that you had no idea what you were
>>>>> pasting when you pasted the fact that life can have positive
>>>>> value. You had no clue then, you have no clue now, so most
>>>>> likely in another couple of years you still will have no clue. It's
>>>>> one of the many pitifully amusing things about all this.
>>>>
>>>>You are not morally entitled to feel satisfaction that an animal got to
>>>>experience life when you consume animal products.
>>>
>>> I can feel satisfaction in contributing to lives of postive value,
>>> even for animals raised to be eaten.
>>
>>You are not morally entitled to feel satisfaction that an animal *got to
>>experience life* when you consume animal products.
>
> I can feel satisfaction in contributing to lives of postive value,
> even for animals raised to be eaten.

That's a completely different statement. You are taking satisfaction in the
"billions of animal raised in the past six years" as your words in the other
thread attest. That makes NO reference at all to "positive value". Your
equivocating is obvious, it always has been,