Doug Kanter wrote:

> Let's go back to bottom posting, which matches the way most civilizations
> read and write. OK? Now - onward:
>
> "Tradition" is not a material thing - it's a way of thinking. In what SOLID
> way does *** marriage affect your daily life? Do you make less money because
> of it? Is it harder to find parking space? Do married gays grab all your
> favorite produce at the grocery store before you arrive?

I get a kick out of people like Wolf and his neocon buddies. They whine and moan
and tradition and Christian morals but half the self righteous dinks are
divorced or are out having extramarital affairs. So much for their Christian
values. Let's not forget some of those evangelists who got caught getting hand
jobs from hookers or drugging and raping their staff.

The neocons should be grateful to the more liberal minded who allow ***
marriages. The secret blot it to breed homosexuality out of the population.
There is pretty good evidence that homosexuality is an inherited trait, and
people tend to pass on their genetic traits through reproduction. Gays have
been socialized into sham marriages which lead to normal heterosexual practices
and reproduction, passing on their *** genes to their children.

When you stop hassling homosexuals, stop coercing them to pretend they are
straight, stop coercing them into unions with the opposite sex, they stop
breeding more of their kind. They are free to enter same sex unions and most of
them do not have children. In a short time there will be few, if any, people
born with inherited homosexuality. It's a shame that they never learned to let
their enemy take care of itself.






>
>
> You mentioned "brain defects". That's also a matter of perception. George
> Bush's energy policies are made in meetings whose attendees are a closely
> guarded secret. I think anyone who doesn't question this has a brain defect,
> but you probably see it differently. I think that if a cashier gives you 5
> plastic bags for 7 lightweight grocery items, he/she has a "brain defect".
> How do we solve this "brain defect" problem?