On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:42:59 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:

>
><dh@.> wrote
>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:30:18 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><dh@.> wrote
>>>> On 15 Jan 2006 15:55:57 -0800, "Dave" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Presumably the poster you are replying to would not eat the
>>>>>products on those grounds.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe. It's more certain that he/she would not eat products
>>>> in order to deliberately contribute to decent lives for animals
>>>> raised to eat.
>>>
>>>I would hope not. Nobody in their right mind thinks like that.
>>
>> Some of us do, which is why we buy cage free eggs, and
>> why growers can profit from making them available.
>
>Stop playing games ****wit. People choose to eat free range *instead of*
>conventionally-produced products because they prefer to support better
>animal welfare, not because they support animals "getting to experience
>life". Nobody in their right mind thinks it's better to eat a free-range egg
>and support a hen "getting to experience life" than to not eat an egg at
>all.

You just aren't really in favor of decent AW, which I've known for
years. If you were, you would be in favor of people supporting it even
if they never eat an egg at all. You consistently leave me nothing to
believe except that you must be an "ara", because even after all of
your obvious stupidity I still can't believe you're as stupid as you act.