dh@. wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:30:18 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>
>><dh@.> wrote
>>
>>>On 15 Jan 2006 15:55:57 -0800, "Dave" > wrote:
>>
>>>>Presumably the poster you are replying to would not eat the
>>>>products on those grounds.
>>>
>>> Maybe. It's more certain that he/she would not eat products
>>>in order to deliberately contribute to decent lives for animals
>>>raised to eat.
>>
>>I would hope not. Nobody in their right mind thinks like that.
>
>
> Some of us do,

You don't give a shit about quality of life for
livestock, ****wit. ALL you care about is that the
livestock exist:

Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be
born if nothing prevents that from happening,
that would experience the loss if their lives
are prevented.
****wit - 08/01/2000

What gives you the right to want to deprive
them [unborn animals] of having what life they
could have?
****wit - 10/12/2001